si-blog

Catching up - part 2

Posted Dec 01, 2008 in Events, Miscellaneous, Politics.

Over the last year, a large part of my life has been devoted to Wikipedia. I've been a regular Wikipedian since the summer of 2005; as a fan of all flavors of Battlestar Galactica, I began editing (and creating) pages associated with the new version created by Star Trek alumnus Ronald D. Moore. Since then, I have spent much of my time monitoring recent changes for harmful edits, paying particular attention to articles that get a lot of vandalism, such as the article on atheism. Recently, however, my focus has been on articles associated with the recent presidential election.

I have no vote in United States elections, being a British citizen, but certainly I have been interested in the outcome. In the early stages of the election, I was hoping that Joe Biden would come out on top. As the primary season progressed, it became apparent that the man to watch was Barack Obama. I knew nothing about the man, so I looked him up on Wikipedia (like you do). I was disappointed to find that the article was under seige by (mostly racist) vandals, so I quickly became a regular editor. During the late 2007 and the bulk of 2008, I have been patrolling many articles associated with Obama; reverting vandalism and monitoring edits for neutrality and verifiability. This quickly became an enormous task, with my editing contributions spiking from 50-odd edits per month to well in excess of 400 - most of which were frenetic discussions on article discussion pages.

I was pleased with the result of what became an historic election, not because I believe the best man one (although I do think that), but because I know that visitors using Wikipedia to look up information about the candidates will have been presented with high-quality articles, properly sourced and verified, that would help them to make informed decisions about which candidate to vote for. The Obama-related articles were as accurate as possible - largely free of the blatant attempts by misguided Republicans, conservative ideologues and racists to use them as a means to misinform and spread fear and lies. Although I continue to monitor these, the noise level has significantly dropped since the election. I am back to doing less than a hundred edits per month, and I have altered (and shortened) my watchlist to focus on other things a bit more.

Comments

  1. Gravatar

    Amazing. So, how are you doing Jessey? Happy Festivus! :)

    Posted by David Collantes on Dec 10, 2008.

Enter a comment

You may only use plain text. Carriage returns are automatically converted into line breaks. Including a URI will automatically trump any given email address. HTML entities will be automatically encoded, and quotation marks are permissable. Comment spam, offensive remarks, off topic nonsense, and flames will be deleted. Comments entered for the purpose of garnering referral links will also be deleted. Cookies are required, but the answer to the security question will not be stored.

Comments include Gravatars. Associated with your email address, they allow you to have little images by your comments.